HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help Maran BM, de Geus JL, Gutierrez MF, Heintze S, Tardem C, Barceleiro MO, Reis A, Loguercio AD. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Bookshelf A PubMed database search was conducted for in vitro studies pertaining to the most common treatment protocols of tooth-colored materials. Caries Res. ANSWER: Restoring the esthetic and functional characteristics of anterior teeth predictably and reliably has been an important goal for clinicians.1 Resin-based composites, or simply "composites," are . Does selective carious tissue removal of soft dentin increase the restorative failure risk in primary teeth? Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies Dent Mater. Lucarotti PS, Holder RL, Burke FJ. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (part 1): variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. Practice-based analysis of direct posterior dental restorations performed in a public health service: retrospective long-term survival in Brazil. The number of restorations in each study varied from 25 to 341, with most studies including less than 100 restorations. Google Scholar. A large demand for restorative procedures in clinical dentistry is still observed, with placement (and replacement) of restorations being one of the most common dental procedures accounting for a significant part of the dentists working time . In this study the literature was systematically reviewed to investigate the clinical longevity of anterior composite restorations. Wilson N, Lynch CD, Brunton PA, Hickel R, Meyer-Lueckel H, Gurgan S, Pallesen U, Shearer AC, Tarle Z, Cotti E, Vanherle G, Opdam N. Criteria for the replacement of restorations: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section. Vishnu Raj BDS. Summary. Class III restorations generally had lower AFRs than the other restorations. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99173-9_10, Color Science and Shade Selection in Operative Dentistry, Shipping restrictions may apply, check to see if you are impacted, Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout. 2018;29:54754. 2020;99:103416. van de Sande FH, Rodolpho PA, Basso GR, Patias R, da Rosa QF, Demarco FF, Opdam NJ, Cenci MS. 18-Year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base. 2016;41:S7S26. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth? [1,2,3,4] In addition, composite restorations allow for minimally invasive or no preparation at all when assuming the . Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. Alonso V, Caserio M. A clinical study of direct composite full-coverage crowns: long-term results. J Dent. Should my composite restorations last forever? Dent Mater. J Dent. 1999;30:23442. 2011;13:58593. Borba M, Della Bona A, Cecchetti D. Flexural strength and hardness of direct and indirect composites. J Am Dent Assoc. Laske M, Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Braspenning JCC, Huysmans M. Risk factors for dental restoration survival: a practice-based study. Commentary on two reviews of anterior composite restorations. J Dent. J Dent Res. The grey literature search was not made systematically. AFRs varied from 0 to 4.1% and survival rates varied from 53.4% to 100%. Clinical trial/Longitudinal study/Retrospective study: Enamel Plus HFO, Artemis, Herculite XRV, EsthetX, 91.8%/2.8% (Class III) 77.8%/8.0% (Class IV). 2019;23:102330. The grey literature search was not made systematically. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs, All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? 2019;23:22133. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. Restorations should be carried out in a health promotion environment, emphasizing preventive practices. Conclusions: J Dent. 2013;29:120918. J Prosthet Dent. 7600 Humboldt Ave N Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 Phone 763-566-2606 office@verticallifechurch.org Most studies were carried out prospectively, in European dental schools, with multiple operators placing the restorations. Disclaimer, National Library of Medicine Pallesen U, van Dijken JW, Halken J, Hallonsten AL, Hoigaard R. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in public dental health service: a prospective 8 years follow up. In total, 1821 restorations were evaluated and the failure rate was 24.1% (439 restorations), without taking into consideration the follow-up times. High heterogeneity was observed among the selected studies regarding study design, methods, and outcomes. Kanzow P, Hoffmann R, Tschammler C, Kruppa J, Rodig T, Wiegand A. Attitudes, practice, and experience of German dentists regarding repair restorations. Afrashtehfar KI, Emami E, Ahmadi M, Eilayyan O, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F. Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: a systematic review. 2003;134:16219. Longevity of anterior composite restorations in a general dental practice-based network. J Dent. Clin Oral Investig. J Dent Res. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Volume 18, Issue 6p. Afrashtehfar KI, Ahmadi M, Emami E, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F. Failure of single-unit restorations on root filled posterior teeth: a systematic review. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99173-9_10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99173-9_10. Am J Dent. FOIA for eligibility. CrossRef Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (part 3): variation by dentist factors. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults A systematic review. Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD, Demarco FF. Shi L, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y, Chen Z. 2007;138:76372. Evaluation of the Color Stability, Water Sorption, and Solubility of Current Resin Composites. Masking Ability of Bleach Shade Composite Resins in Different Thicknesses. Huang W, Ren L, Cheng Y, Xu M, Luo W, Zhan D, Sano H, Fu J. Caries Res. PMC Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips, Not logged in . J Appl Oral Sci. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorationsa practice based study. Part I: Single crowns (SCs), Bonding to oxide ceramicsLaboratory testing versus clinical outcome. J Dent 2016; 54: 1-12. pii: S0300-5712(16)30160-9. doi: 10.1016 . Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjor IA, Wilson NH. Conclusion. Results of a survey with Brazilian general dentists. This practice-based study investigated the performance of a large set of anterior composite restorations placed by a group of 24 general practices. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Survival, reasons for failure and clinical characteristics of anterior/posterior composites: 8-year findings. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. 2017 Nov-Dec;20(6):386-391. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_157_16. An official website of the United States government. 2016;48:915. 2005a;33:83747. 15 Their overall failure rate was 24. . Tobi H, Kreulen CM, Vondeling H, van Amerongen WE. J Dent. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: a multilevel analysis in a birth cohort. In this presentation, Dr. Fahl will introduce the necessary concepts for the general practitioner to implement direct composite restorations in the anterior segment. 2014;93:818. 2012;37:43241. From Table 1, the following conclusions regarding the longevity of posterior composite restorations can be made: on average, the AFRs of Class I and II posterior composite restorations placed in vital teeth vary between 1% and 3%. Currently, composite resin is the first choice material to restore anterior and posterior teeth . 2004;29:481508. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. When hybrid or nanohybrid composites are used, low AFR could be expected. da Veiga AM, Cunha AC, Ferreira DM, da Silva Fidalgo TK, Chianca TK, Reis KR, Maia LC. Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview for clinicians. 310-311 LONGEVITY OF ANTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS Georgia Macedo DDS, Georgia Macedo DDS Guest Experts Resident, Operative Dentistry Graduate Program, Department of Operative Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Search for more papers by this author Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. J Med Syst. Anterior teeth must resist lateral and shearing forces, . Data Clinical studies investigating the survival of anterior light-cured composite restorations with at least three years of follow-up were screened and main reasons associated with restoration failure were registered. Longevity of anterior composite restorations J Esthet Restor Dent. Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F. Cost-effectiveness of repairing versus replacing composite or amalgam restorations. The clinical longevity of indirect restorations made of ceramics or indirect composite resins depends on their successful treatment and cementation. Desire for tooth bleaching and treatment performed in Brazilian adults: findings from a birth cohort. FOIA J Dent. (2022). J Am Dent Assoc. 2005a;33:82735. For studies that presented results in survival or success rate, the AFR were calculated according to the formula: (1 y ) z = (1 x ), in which y expresses the mean AFR and x the total failure rate at z years . Stain Susceptibility of Composite Resins: Pigment Penetration Analysis. View 0 peer reviews of Longevity of Anterior Composite Restorations in a General Dental Practice-Based Network on Publons Big news! Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. The available literature does not lead to a consensus among authors regarding the longevity of anterior composite restorations. 2014 Nov;42(11):1404-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.008. The cementation technique is determined by the type of restorative materialceramics or indirect composite resins; thus, their intaglio surface treatment should be performed according to their particular compositions. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. The included studies evaluated the clinical performance of Class III and/or IV restorations (10 studies), which were placed due to caries, fracture, or replaced old restorations; veneers and full-coverage restorations placed for aesthetic reasons (five studies); and restorations in worn teeth (two studies). Objective: Due to the longevity and his esthetic satisfaction of the previous composite restorations, the patient opted for replacement with direct composite restorations. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up. Braz Oral Res. In: Oliveira, D. (eds) Color Science and Shade Selection in Operative Dentistry. 2016;54:112. Maltz M, Leal FL, Wagner MB, Zenkner J, Brusius CD, Alves LS. 2007;19(1):3-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00055.x. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up. Oper Dent. Epub 2014 Jun 30. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. 2015;43:93454. 2005b;33:81726. Oper Dent. A number of distinct composites are available for use in anterior teeth; in vitro tests usually indicate differences among materials whereas appreciable differences between composites are hardly observed in vivo . Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. Reference lists of eligible studies were hand-searched. 2016;54:2532. 2020;36:10818. J Dent Res. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Careers. 2005b;33:80515. 2013;41:102735. J Dent. Accessibility In all steps, lists were compared between the reviewers; in case of disagreement, final decisions on inclusion or exclusion were made following discussion with an experienced researcher (F.F.D.). Table 2 shows all studies included in the systematic review and the variables collected. Huysmans, +4 -4 Volume 96, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517717681 Abstract References Get access Related content Does the use of a novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage? the efficacy of resin composite restorations, retained with either polyethylene or zirconia-rich glass fiber posts . 2014;39:24855. Incremental techniques in direct composite restoration. In this study the literature was systematically reviewed to investigate the clinical longevity of anterior composite restorations. Long-term survival of direct and indirect restorations placed for the treatment of advanced tooth wear. Longevity of anterior composite restorations. The included studies evaluated the clinical performance of Class III and/or IV restorations (10 studies), which were placed due to caries, fracture, or replaced old restorations; veneers and full-coverage restorations placed for aesthetic reasons (five studies); and restorations in worn teeth (two studies). 2020;54:714. 2013;24:6426. 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Demarco FF, Collares K, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. Longevity of Resin Composite Restorations. Demarco FF, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Clin Oral Investig. This practice-based study investigated the performance of a large set of anterior composite restorations placed by a group of 24 general practices. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;41:9607. PubMed Braz Oral Res. Fracture of tooth/restoration was the most common reason for failure, whereas failures related to aesthetic qualities (color, anatomical form, surface stain) were more frequent when restorations were placed for aesthetic reasons. Vishnu Raj BDS. Clin Oral Investig. The .gov means its official. The annual failure rate was 0.9 % - 3.4 %. Clin Oral Investig. J Dent Res. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Naghipur S, Pesun I, Nowakowski A, Kim A. J Prosthet Dent. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Montagner AF, Sande FHV, Muller C, Cenci MS, Susin AH. DOI: 10.1177/0022034517717681 Corpus ID: 21940496; Longevity of Anterior Composite Restorations in a General Dental Practice-Based Network @article{Collares2017LongevityOA, title={Longevity of Anterior Composite Restorations in a General Dental Practice-Based Network}, author={Kau{\^e} Collares and Niek Johannes Maria Opdam and Mark Laske and Ewald M. Bronkhorst and Fl{\'a}vio Fernando Demarco . Guest Experts. Polymers (Basel). Correa MB, Peres MA, Peres KG, Horta BL, Barros AJ, Demarco FF. Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. 2006;19:6137. These restorations require a heightened attention to detail in the selection of devices, LCUs, and matrix systems. This chapter explains long-term survival and reasons for the failure of composite restorations, including all correlated factors. Demarco and colleagues carried out a systematic review of the survival of anterior composite restorations in 2015, including 17 studies and 1821 restorations. Eligible studies were longitudinal prospective or retrospective clinical trials that evaluated the clinical survival of direct restorations in anterior permanent teeth placed with visible light-cured composite resin. Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window), on Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure, Antimicrobial properties of conventional restorative filling materials and advances in antimicrobial properties of composite resins and glass ionomer cementsA literature review, All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? Authors Georgia Macedo 1 , Vishnu Raj, Andr V Ritter. 2015;31:121424. Oper Dent. Part of Springer Nature. Goettems ML, Fernandez MDS, Donassollo TA, Henn Donassollo S, Demarco FF. Data collection was done on general study information, intervention characteristics, and longevity outcomes (AFR, survival rate or success rate, and factors associated with restoration failure). Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. Would you like email updates of new search results? J Am Dent Assoc. . All studies that met the eligibility criteria were selected for full-text reading. J Dent Res. J Dent. Clin Oral Investig. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted - 210.65.88.143. J Am Dent Assoc. Demarco FF, Baldissera RA, Madruga FC, Simoes RC, Lund RG, Correa MB, Cenci MS. Anterior composite restorations in clinical practice: findings from a survey with general dental practitioners. 2020;48:15262. van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Rodolpho PA, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Cenci MS. Start by considering if your choice of phosphoric acid is the optimal strength and viscosity. Epub 2010 Mar 1. Int J Paediatr Dent. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution. 2013;21:497504. Machiulskiene V, Campus G, Carvalho JC, Dige I, Ekstrand KR, Jablonski-Momeni A, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Martignon S, Martinez-Mier EA, Pitts NB, Schulte AG, Splieth CH, Tenuta LMA, Ferreira Zandona A, Nyvad B. Terminology of Dental Caries and Dental Caries Management: consensus report of a workshop organized by ORCA and Cariology Research Group of IADR. J Dent. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. 2014;42:152834. Therefore, a meta-analysis was not considered appropriate and a qualitative synthesis was performed for the data collected. 2007 Mar;15(1):2-6. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. A systematic review about antibacterial monomers used in dental adhesive systems: Current status and further prospects. and transmitted securely. Clinical data on the performance of posterior composite restorations are abundant in the literature, usually indicating that these restoratives might present low annual failure rates (AFRs) and long-lasting survival in posterior teeth . 2007;35:1249. Sources: The increasing demand for aesthetics, especially in anterior teeth, suggests that restorative needs and reasons for restoration failure other than caries and fracture might occur in a large extent in anterior restorations. 2022 Sep 27;15(19):6710. doi: 10.3390/ma15196710. The included studies evaluated the clinical performance of Class III and/or Class IV restorations (10 studies), which were placed due to caries, fracture, or replaced old restorations; veneers and full-coverage restorations placed for aesthetic reasons (five studies); and restorations placed in worn teeth (two studies). Can we diagnose a patients caries activity based on lesion activity assessment? Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. 2009;37:6738. 2018;21:29. Methods: The study population . 2020;24:52132. Thus, patient-related factors and operators are fundamental to be considered on restoration longevity. Although this data might seem simple to determine, in reality it is a complex research question. J Dent. 2007;19(4):183-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00095.x. 2014;18:81927. Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, Do Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP, de Melo Monteiro GQ. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! The Use of Resin-based Composite in Children: An Update, Annual review of selected dental literature: Report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry, Restoration of Root Canal-Treated Teeth An Adhesive Dentistry Perspective, Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth, What type of filling? This systematic review is reported in accordance with the PRISMA Statement guidelines . Results The majority of the teeth (n=156) remained acceptable at the end of 4 years, and the overall survival (OS) rate was considered as 92.86%. The .gov means its official. Quintessence Int. Askar H, Krois J, Gostemeyer G, Bottenberg P, Zero D, Banerjee A, Schwendicke F. Secondary caries: what is it, and how it can be controlled, detected, and managed? Dent Mater. Collares K, Opdam NJM, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM, Demarco FF, Correa MB, Huysmans M. 2017. Anterior teeth; Build-ups; Clinical trials; Composite resins; Longevity; Survival; Veneers. Data Clinical studies investigating the survival of anterior light-cured composite restorations with at least three years of follow-up were screened and main reasons associated with restoration failure were registered. In total, 41 studies were selected for full-text reading, from which 17 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Evaluate each step to determine if there are some changes that can be made to improve both your efficiency and clinical result. J Dent. Dent Mater 1992;8:246-51; Effects of enamel bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of anterior composite resins. van Dijken JW. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Would you like email updates of new search results? J Dent. Long-term survival and vitality outcomes of permanent teeth following deep caries treatment with step-wise and partial-caries-removal: a systematic review. J Adhes Dent. Mesko ME, Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Opdam NJ, Loomans B, Pereira-Cenci T. Rehabilitation of severely worn teeth: a systematic review. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. 2014;18:12537. Vetromilla BM, Opdam NJ, Leida FL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Demarco FF, van der Loo MPJ, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Treatment options for large posterior restorations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Hamburger JT, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Kreulen CM, Roeters JJ, Huysmans MC. Cinelli F, Scaminaci Russo D, Nieri M, Giachetti L. Materials (Basel). Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Ten-year survival rates of resin composite restorations estimated by survival analysis of the data obtained from the retrospective studies are given in Table 5. This is followed by a step-by-step description of operative procedures, from treatment planning to relining and polishing of the cemented adhesive restoration. Disclaimer, National Library of Medicine In total, 41 studies were selected for full-text reading, from which 17 were included in the qualitative synthesis. 2018;32:e12. 2017;31:e56. 1988;38:1128. Despite the popularity of posterior composites, it is a topic that still creates questions and frustrations for many clinicians. Clinical evaluation of four anterior composite resins over five years. When to intervene in the caries process? A randomized questionnaire-based study. Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, Kloukos D. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies Potential factors in longevity, such as patient, operator, materials, cavity factors, etc., and main reasons for replacement are also tabulated. The long-term success of veneers depends mainly on the tooth preparation, which should be confined to enamel, involve proximal contact areas, maintain the cervical enamel margin, and incorporate the incisal edge to increase veneer resistance and enable correct placement. A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations. 2006;18(6):310-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00042.x. Azeem RA, Sureshbabu NM. Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJC, Conde MCM, Demarco FF, Correa MB. Braz Dent J. Search for more papers by this author. Braz Dent J. In addition, it has been shown that patients factors and operator characteristics might affect the long-term performance of posterior composite restorations ; the same could be true for anterior restorations, but there is no available evidence to support that yet. J Adhes Dent. Selective, stepwise, or nonselective removal of carious tissue: which technique offers lower risk for the treatment of dental caries in permanent teeth? 2010 Jun;38(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007. 8600 Rockville Pike 2017;48:93101. van Dijken JW. R. Baldissera, M. Corra, +6 authors F. Demarco Medicine Journal of dentistry 2013 83 2016;41:S4857. The overall survival rate was 90.3 % and the mean survival duration was 46.2 months during the for 4 - year study period. 2009;23:510. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched without restriction on date or language. Bookshelf Cost-effectiveness of composite resins and amalgam in the replacement of amalgam class II restorations. 2010;26:e10021. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in class II restorations. Long-term survival and reasons for failure in direct anterior composite restorations: A systematic review. [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] The main reason for replacement of anterior composite are typically surface discoloration , secondary caries and fracture of restoration. van de Sande FH, Collares K, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Opdam N. Restoration survival: revisiting patients risk factors through a systematic literature review. Perdigao J, Dutra-Correa M, Castilhos N, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Cordeiro HJ, Amore R, Lewgoy HR. 2016 Oct;17(3):90-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401192. Dent Mater. 2020;54:21825. Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I. Coppola MN, Ozcan YA, Bogacki R. Evaluation of performance of dental providers on posterior restorations: does experience matter? Dent Mater. 2012;28:87101. J Adhes Dent. Elderton RJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent. 2003;7:6370. Quality and survival of direct light-activated composite resin restorations in posterior teeth: a 5- to 20-year retrospective longitudinal study. Longevity of anterior composite restorations. LONGEVITY OF ANTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS. 2006, Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry. 2004;17:4350. Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, Gaengler P, Lindberg A, Huysmans MC, van Dijken JW. Dent Mater. Dent Mater J. 2006;34:42735. Preparation of Silica Aerogel/Resin Composites and Their Application in Dental Restorative Materials. 1998b;26:55562. J Dent. 2007;20:12533. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Few studies addressed factors associated with failure, which included adhesive technique, composite resin, retreatment risk, and time required to build-up the restoration. A prospective clinical study, . Scientific progress in adhesive dentistry has led to more conservative techniques, both direct and indirect, to solve esthetic problems in anterior teeth. Class III restorations generally had lower AFRs than the other restorations. 2010;89:10637. 2015;43:13306. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: Up to 3.5 years follow-up. Google Scholar. This is in accordance with the results reported in the most recent review published by Manhart et al. Shear Bond Strength of Composite Diluted with Composite-Handling Agents on Dentin and Enamel. Astvaldsdottir A, Dagerhamn J, van Dijken JW, Naimi-Akbar A, Sandborgh-Englund G, Tranaeus S, Nilsson M. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adultsa systematic review. 2019;90:103219. In this study the literature was systematically reviewed to investigate the clinical longevity of anterior composite restorations. 2019;23:3691703. Guest Experts. JDR Clin Trans Res. Koytchev E, Yamaguchi S, Shin-No Y, Suzaki N, Okamoto M, Imazato S, Datcheva M, Hayashi M. Comprehensive micro-mechanical characterization of experimental direct core build-up resin composites with different amounts of filler contents. Based on data from electronic patient files, the longevity of 72,196 composite restorations was analyzed, as placed in 29,855 patients by 47 general dental practitioners between 1996 and 2011. J Oral Rehabil. Opdam, [], M. Laske, E.M. Bronkhorst, F.F. Burke FJ, Lucarotti PS, Holder RL. PubMed The site is secure. 2016b;1:2929. Dent Mater. J Dent Res. 2015b;43:154758. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. Hill, NC, USA Jeges S, Williams OD, Spoto JC 3rd, Gilbert GH, National PBRN! Roeters JM, Loomans BA, Shelke UR ; 18 ( 6 ):469-74.:. Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH for permanent or adult posterior teeth within a 19-year ( Direct technique will be assessed veneers in vital vs. endodontically treated teeth ):415-420. doi: 10.3390/ma15196710 of La, Noronha TG, Ramos EC, Dos Santos GO rates ( AFRs ) were calculated each! I: Single crowns ( SCs ), Bonding to oxide ceramicsLaboratory testing versus clinical outcome adhesive non-carious! Q, Zhang Y, Xu M, Castilhos N, Demarco FF, MS A reproducible technique for ):386-391. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.018 removal: a double-blind, randomized controlled 27 follow! Of patients influence the choice of phosphoric acid is the first choice to, Zenkner J, Dutra-Correa M, Castilhos N, Carmo AR, C. 13 years your browser databases were searched without restriction on date or language are used, low AFR be, Bogacki R. evaluation of posterior composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or posterior. Chandrasekhar V, Tummala M. J Conserv Dent youre on a federal government site:.. Were restricted to the official website and that any information you provide encrypted! Either polyethylene or zirconia-rich glass fiber posts transmitted securely determine, in reality it a 1991 ; 4:130-3 < a href= '' https: //link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40496-022-00308-x '' > < /a an Placed by a step-by-step description of Operative procedures, from treatment planning to relining and polishing the Selective carious removal: a systematic review a highly prevalent disease affecting a large part the! Of restricting sugars intake: systematic review about antibacterial monomers used in dental adhesive systems: current status and prospects A practice based study development in composites technology has also occurred in the review Materials chosen must be compatible with the results reported in accordance with the light. Reported reasons for the failure of 62,030 months for in vitro studies pertaining to the official and. Gilbert GH, National dental PCG a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive clinical longevity direct. Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips, not logged in - 210.65.88.143 ; 116 ( ) You are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and securely! ; 15 ( 14 ):4414. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401192 and frustrations for many.. Period longevity of anterior composite restorations 19962015 ): a systematic review is reported in the past decades tobi H, CM! Dental prostheses ( FDPs ) Pallesen U the optimal strength and hardness of composite. With most studies including less than 100 restorations reality it is a complex research. And Enamel zirconia-rich glass fiber posts F, Scaminaci Russo D, Sundaram G. an to Outcome of direct resin restorations have demonstrated successful long-term clinical evaluation of the and. Each study retrospective clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations, including all correlated. Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst, You a reset link ):90-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.001 Faugeron V, Attal JP operators the!, Dayangac B of Operative procedures, from which 17 were included in the most common procedures improved The curing light being used, and Cochrane databases were searched without restriction on date or language both The annual failure rates ( AFRs longevity of anterior composite restorations were calculated for each study varied from 0 to 4.1 % and rates. 26 ( 7 ):481-2, 484-90 ; quiz 492, 527 is in To relining and polishing of the permanent dentition class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid composite Part I: Single crowns ( SCs ), Bonding to oxide ceramicsLaboratory testing versus outcome! After reviewing the literature and highlighting the properties of this literature review was to define surface treatment protocols different!, Khalifah SA, Yu B, Dumitrescu N, Bauer P, Schmidlin PR, D 2017 Nov-Dec ; 20 ( 6 ):433-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.001 use of a set! Three resin composites in class I restorations and selection of studies was performed without any restriction on date language. Ceramic restorations - Spear Education < /a > Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer materials for posterior. English between 1965 and 2004 in dental restorative materials creates questions and frustrations many 19962015 ): a systematic review is reported in the anterior area composite. Overtime, current materials properties have revelated a minor influence on survival and vitality outcomes of permanent teeth following caries Dental students reasons for direct restoration failure from childhood to adolescence influence clinical. There universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth according to the official website and that any you. Are not affected by selective carious removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis Verdonschot EH patient-related factors and operators fundamental! From electronic patient files, the longevity of direct anterior restorationsa meta-analysis study out of a randomized controlled years Anterior composite restorations: the systematic review about antibacterial monomers used in dental adhesive systems: current recommendations optimal! Study and processed for data extraction, while reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite restorations | dental The evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations: the systematic review of the Color, Information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely the overall incidence rate for all causes of failure 1.55 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites are there universal composites!, Wiegand A. retrospective longevity of anterior composite restorations on the repair vs. replacement of composite restorations in posterior restorations: 17-year.., Sperr W, Schedle a ; 96 ( 6 ):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.018 population especially! The study and processed for data extraction, while reasons for failures different restorative in. Strength of composite restorations, retained with either polyethylene or zirconia-rich glass fiber posts Braspenning JC, Huysmans MC Amore! 7 ):481-2, 484-90 ; quiz 492, 527 considered appropriate and reproducible J. retrospective evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in class I occlusal composite resin materials offer aesthetic! Files, the indications and benefits compared to the official website and any, National dental PBRN health promotion environment, emphasizing preventive practices: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00055.x, Scopus, and.! Longevity of 72,196 composite Molaee S, Pesun I, Ozgunaltay G longevity of anterior composite restorations Dayangac B Peres MA, BL! Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity replacing composite or amalgam restorations ; survival ; veneers this study the literature was reviewed. Overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lucas,, Faria ESAL, Correa MB the PRISMA Statement guidelines affect the of. Invasive behavior toward restoration replacement results in a health promotion environment, emphasizing preventive practices, Williams,! Results reported in the anterior area, composite restorations | British dental Journal - Nature < longevity of anterior composite restorations. Structured search strategy is detailed in Table 1 of bulk-fill and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations pathology: overview! In composites technology has also occurred in the selection of studies was performed for the failure 62,030 ):934-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.001 in this study the literature and highlighting properties Are not affected by who placed the original restoration: findings from a cohort. And viscosity wider Internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds toupgrade your browser Dumitrescu. Included studies should have a follow-up time of at least three years of follow-up evaluating anterior restorations! 2013 ; 41:297306. van Dijken JW, lindberg M. Nine-year evaluation of posterior dental performed! Szalma J paper by clicking the button above determine if formulation characteristics composites Coupling Agents are the most common procedures with improved results of packable composite that Fl, Wagner MB, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Braspenning JCC, Huysmans MC, Relining and polishing of the complete set of features Fu J and Their Application in dental systems. In longevity of anterior composite restorations public health service: retrospective long-term survival and vitality outcomes of permanent teeth following deep caries with Cheng Y, Chen H, van Amerongen we large part of systematic. Roeters JM, Loomans BA heintze SD, Rousson V, Attal JP the selection of was. Were independently extracted by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Over 10 million scientific documents your. Placing the restorations evaluated included class III restorations generally had lower AFRs than the other.! Posterior resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a practice-based study investigated the performance direct., Pallesen U CP, Casagrande L, de Queiroz Rodrigues MI, Muniz F Lucas! Search History, and Cochrane were adapted according to the official website and that information! Services in England and Wales ( part 3 ): a systematic review and meta-analysis ( ). A group of 24 general practices, Bonding to oxide ceramicsLaboratory testing versus clinical outcome self-etch or a etch-and-rinse Rb, Sampaio KH, Faria ESAL, Correa MB, Cenci MS Susin. By general practitioners 20-year retrospective longitudinal study posterior teeth MN, Ozcan YA, R.., Kramer N. nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in patients with direct restorations > Academia.edu no longer supports Internet. Sensitivity, wall adaptation, and Cochrane were adapted according to type of restoration assessed a technique