The American M101A1 howitzer fired 105mm HEAT or HE rounds, both of which had enough penetration to pierce the 40mm top armor of a Tiger II. The new weapon represents an exponential leap beyond existing state-of-the art anti-tank weapons such as the TOW and Javelin missiles; the Javelin reaches ranges up to 2.5miles and the TOW missile can hit targets out to 3,000 meters. Definitely. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. The shock of impact will be such as to incapacitate the vehicle and/or destroy its ability to return fire. Modern tanks typically arent built to withstand direct impacts for artillery, but indirect shellfall poses little harm. Can artillery destroy a tank? But yes a direct hit from a 155 round would probably kill an Abrams, especially since the arc or the round will see it go right through the top of the tank. The Soviet Army back in the Cold War days planned artillery norms for use against tank units where at least one 122mm or more HE shell or rocket would land in every 10 square meters which statistically would provide a hit to the roof of every tank in that area. Yes. This is a subreddit for War Thunder, a cross platform vehicular combat MMO developed by Gaijin Entertainment for Microsoft Windows, macOS, Linux, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5, Xbox One and Xbox Series X|S. If a Tank is hull down and you are finding it hard to get rid of it, like on an objective, Arty can be effective at least making the tank move. Accurate analysis on concentration of fires, but I have to strongly disagree with your comment on ANY modern tank surviving a direct hit from a 155mm class shell even in front. The Armys M549A1 rocket assisted 155 mm howitzer rounds have a range of about 19 miles. Although this varies between the battles recorded. Cookie Notice At that range, an MT-12 can penetrate 400 millimeters of armorenough to destroy an infantry fighting vehicle and, from certain angles, disable or destroy a tank. Description. Btw, are there any notable examples of tank(s) vs Howitzer(s)/SPH(s) from WWII until now? You wouldn't sit there and just sit out the shelling if you could help it, especially as targeted artillery fire on armoured groups would have likely been a mix of HEAT and HE. This would ensure destruction of the tank unit even if their tanks were dug into two level fighting holes and were all turret down. What qualifications do you need to be a queen's guard? The classifications were seacoast, siege and garrison, field, and mountain. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. The FV215b (183) is a tier X British turreted tank destroyer. The Marine Corps and US Army also uses the M795 High Explosive round. Also map barely even represent minimum range for artillery. However, even a near miss from field artillery or an impact from a mortar HE round could easily disable or destroy the tank: if the fuel tank was ruptured, it could incinerate the tank's crew. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. At that range, an MT-12 can penetrate 400 millimeters of armorenough to destroy an infantry fighting vehicle and, from certain angles, disable or destroy a tank. Then you have the effect of HE artillery shells even if it didn't cause damage to the tank in any significant way it could cause some spalling inside and injure or kill crew as well as disorienting them because when you're inside a metal box and something explodes next to or onto it you still end up with a concussive force. This would be the same for tanks. Field artillery was particularly effective in firing against tank formations because although they were rarely able to destroy a tank by direct penetration, they would severely crater the area preventing the tanks from moving therefore causing them to become nearly stationary targets for the ground attack aircraft . The new weapon represents an exponential leap beyond existing state-of-the art anti-tank weapons such as the TOW and Javelin missiles; the Javelin reaches ranges up to 2.5miles and the TOW missile can hit targets out to 3,000 meters. Anti-tank warfare originated from the need to develop technology and tactics to destroy tanks during World War I.Since the Triple Entente developed the first tanks in 1916 but did not deploy them in battle until 1917, the German Empire developed the first anti-tank weapons. Well a 155mm HE may not penetrate the forntal turret armor but I am not sure if the upper glacis isn't affected heavily due to it being relatively thin and it getting hit by the blast and shrapnel at a flat angle. Tank guns have become much different in recent decades, and armor has advanced quite a lot as well. The new weapon represents an exponential leap beyond existing state-of-the art anti-tank weapons such as the TOW and . The .23-to-.47-inch (5.8 to 11.9 mm) thick armor generally prevented penetration by small arms fire and shell fragments. The .23-to-.47-inch (5.8 to 11.9 mm) thick armor generally prevented penetration by small arms fire and shell fragments. NLAW stops tanks dead in their tracks. Can artillery destroy a tank? But what IRL has over game is the Human factor inside steel box and he doesnt wanna die. Can artillery destroy tanks? Can a 155mm shell destroy a tank? I kinda figured that since tank guns have become so specialized, that they were the only ones that could defeat a modern tank. IRL. Can artillery destroy a tank? Can artillery take out a tank? given the massive amounts of tanks and artillery on both sides, massed artillery fires would have been even more effective at killing tanks in the open . Do you have to have a blog to be an influencer. Any MBTs even modern don't have more than 40mm of plain steel armor on the bottom and top, so a 155mm HE round would definitely disable an MBT, think of an artillery shell hitting the top of a tank. They have tactical nukes for artillery pieces. Using a longer-tube and newer kinds of firing technologies , Army and industry innovators have already doubled the range of existing precision-guided artillery with ERCA. As for how common, about 12.8% of tank losses during WW2 were reliably identified as due to artillery fire during 7 eases of battle. What weapons can destroy a tank? But even a 155mm HEAT shell fired at 800 mps isnt going to defeat the frontal armour of an Abrams tank. Can artillery destroy tanks? The gun's flat elevation means the enemy might be just a mile away, at most. Can artillery destroy a tank? Ordinary high-explosive rounds cost up to $2,000 apiece. Answer (1 of 6): Yes and no. However, View complete answer on axisandallies.org, View complete answer on dupuyinstitute.org, View complete answer on defencedirecteducation.com, View complete answer on military-history.fandom.com, View complete answer on realcleardefense.com, View complete answer on military-today.com, View complete answer on characterisationexplosiveweapons.org. The Challenger 2 is widely considered one of the most capable and formidable main battle tanks in the world . To keep it simple high explosive (HE) artillery defeats tanks via the level of fire concentration and statistics. C-DAEM will be able to hit moving tanks and other armored vehiclessomething existing artillery shells can't do. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Joseph Stalin called artillery the 'God of War' and Soviet doctrine emphasised using it in huge quantities. Ukrainian Artillery destroy Russian tank and its Crew. If a 152mm/155mm HE shell explodes on the ground within 5-10m of a tanks rear or sides it (the tank) is going to be knocked out. Currently Top 10 man-portable anti-tank guided missiles in the the world are these: The 0.23-to-0.47-inch (5.8 to 11.9 mm) thick armor generally prevented penetration by small arms fire and shell fragments. The IS-2s HE would decimate German armor and even the American 75mm HE caved in a Panthers turret (see post for photo link). What is the most powerful tank in World of Tanks? Can artillery destroy tanks? Can an artillery shell destroy a tank? I am curious about this comment here. Shellshock is possible as well. The gun's flat elevation means the enemy might be just a mile away, at most. It will also be able to seek and destroy vehicle targets when their precise . I tell you what during my time with an artillery unit in the U.S. Army if we pack a shell with 7 bags which is the maximum it will stop any tank in it tracks. And it can destroy armored and unarmored vehicles and buildings, too. http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/CGSC/CARL/download/csipubs/9AustralianDivVsAfricaCorps_Miller.pdf. How much does a 155mm artillery shell cost? And depending on the ship most likely not. Can artillery destroy tanks? The M829 is an American armor-piercing, fin-stabilized, discarding sabot (APFSDS) tank round. How do I stop my DSC alarm from beeping Low battery? For the 155 mm RAP round, max range is 30.1 kilometres (18.7 mi). A rule of thumb to calculate how high an artillery shell will go is 1 diameter = 70 feet in height. Regular shells are said to be accurate to within 50 metres. At that range, an MT-12 can penetrate 400 millimeters of armorenough to destroy an infantry fighting vehicle and, from certain angles, disable or destroy a tank. It is the heaviest fully enclosed armored fighting vehicle ever built. And the tank would be completely destroyed with the entire crew killed most likely. Yes, when a tank had a broken track/gun the crew usually just left because they're useless. As for how common, about 12.8% of tank losses during WW2 were reliably identified as due to artillery fire during 7 eases of battle. Like Railguns, Artillery are poor at defending themselves if directly engaged by enemy Infantry or Tanks, so it is wise to station your own Infantry and/or Tanks together with . So the average 1.75 shell will go approximately 120 feet in the air. Artillery was never really intended to wipe out an opposing force. A typical 155 mm (6.1 in) shell weighs about 50 kg, a common 203 mm (8 in) shell about 100 kg, a concrete demolition 203 mm (8 in) shell 146 kg, a 280 mm (11 in) battleship shell about 300 kg, and a 460 mm (18 in) battleship shell over 1,500 kg. You must log in or register to reply here. The .23-to-.47-inch (5.8 to 11.9 mm) thick armor generally prevented penetration by small arms fire and shell fragments. Panzerkampfwagen VIII Maus (English: Mouse) was a German World War II super-heavy tank completed in late 1944. Artillery can cause catastrophic kills on tanks, especially on a steel-on-steel hit. Russian artillery was apparently destroyed by the Ukraine tanks according to General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. and our The M114 howitzer can fire an M107 up to 18.5 km using M4A2 White Bag propellant. Ukrainian Artillery Destroys Russian tank, Causing a Huge Explosion. Even if the hull remains unpenetrated, the shockwave has the potential to kill the crew. The standard artillery shell for the Army and Marine Corps, the 155 mm M795, can be fired at a maximum range of about 14 miles using standard propellant. Ive seen both a Conquerer and Maus get bonked before. I do remember reading about the Poms and Aussies in Tobruk during WWII using the 25 pounder howitzer in direct fire mode as an antitank weapon. It for sure happened in WW1 - that was how a lot of the very first tank assaults were stopped outside of them breaking down/getting stuck. Hm, okay thanks yall. Shooting at tanks with the awesome M2 .50 Caliber Machine Gun. The .23-to-.47-inch (5.8 to 11.9 mm) thick armor generally prevented penetration by small arms fire and shell fragments. Shrapnel, on the other hand, could be dangerous depending on what vehicle you're in. Answer (1 of 11): Yes. Can artillery take out a tank? Ukrainian forces destroy Russian tank column with artillery before storming troopsUkraine has been gifted with top-of-the-range weapons from Western NATO-ali. Therefore, it is smarter to keep these troops slightly far from enemies, but not so far that the artillery can't hit them. The .23-to-.47-inch (5.8 to 11.9 mm) thick armor generally prevented penetration by small arms fire and shell fragments. Aside from that it could damage tracks and warp parts of the tank preventing it from functioning properly. The Excalibur shell uses satellite signals and software to guide it to within 10 metres of its intended target, even when fired from up to 40 kilometres away. Well WW2 artillery knocking out tanks wasnt uncommon with big consentrated barrages. Yes, the top armor on a lot of tanks during WW2 was usually pretty thin compared to the armor around the sides, front and back, plus you have unarmoured areas such as engine covers etc. Am I wrong? The first developed anti-tank weapon was a scaled-up bolt-action rifle, the Mauser 1918 T-Gewehr, that fired a 13mm . Are you referring to direct hits/fire or indirect battery fire in terms of the potential damage inflicted? However, even a near miss from field artillery or an impact from a mortar HE round could easily disable or destroy the tank: if the fuel tank was ruptured, it could incinerate the tank . But the key issue is firing enough rounds into the area to ensure that statistically a shell will detonate within the lethal distance of each or most of the tanks within that area. Weighing just 12.5 kilograms, NLAW is a portable, shoulder-launched system that can be used by a single operator. TimesMojo is a social question-and-answer website where you can get all the answers to your questions. 2022 Times Mojo - All Rights Reserved This aerial footage shows a number of Russian artillery pieces hiding among trees being destroyed in a series of explosions. At that range, an MT-12 can penetrate 400 millimeters of armorenough to destroy an infantry fighting vehicle and, from certain angles, disable or destroy a tank. #Ukrainian Forces Destroy #Russian Troops T-72 Tank and Armored Vehicle Using Advance Artillery. Its armour-piercing warhead can destroy a heavily protected modern battle tank with one shot, and the system is effective at ranges between 20 and 800 metres. Can an earthbender turn rocks into diamonds? The mighty Soviet armies of World War Two, that crushed Hitler's armies were large conscripted forces with limited tactical capability. Even a non-penetrating shell could still disable a tank through dynamic shock, internal armor shattering or simply overturning the tank. With that said, I think if an arty shell managed to hit the top of a tank where the armor is very thin, it would absolutely take it out - so to me the question is if it has physically happened before. I thought Id share this in appreciation of our beautiful NATO tanks should bow before the might of the T-54 and T-55. According to the Marine Corps and other authorities, the 50 caliber can still blast through more lightly armored vehicles, such as armored personnel carriers, and thus clearly through armored limousines, despite the fact that tanks are generally impervious to 50 caliber rounds.